Search This Blog

Showing posts with label logic. Show all posts
Showing posts with label logic. Show all posts

Feelings


Several weeks ago I posted a commentary about Mormonism and whether or not it might be a cult, which came up as a result of the furor over Mitt Romney as a Mormon presidential candidate. Since that whole episode, the Mormon PR team has covered the country with billboards and other ads promoting their faith. One online ad caught my eye in particular, but not in a favorable light. It had a picture of a very attractive young woman with the quote, “I feel God is proud of me for who I am.” (or something very close to that).

The problem with that ad is a cultural issue endemic in mainstream Christianity and the culture as a whole, and is not unique to the LDS church. Simply put, it is deriving truth from emotion.

God gave us emotions and intuition. In fact, I am a fairly intuitive person much of the time. However, I view our emotions primarily as spice, or seasoning in the decision making process. The “meat and potatoes” of clear thinking are truth, wisdom and logic, in that order.

Sophomorisms


Tuesday I was walking on campus and came upon a co-ed standing at the top of some steps and reading out loud from some document, much like some campus preachers read Scripture to passers-by. There was a guy with a camera filming her, and another guy who shoved a leaflet in my hand entitled, “What is a Free Thinker?”

Under that was the following:
free-think-er n. A person who forms opinions about religion on the basis of reason, independently of tradition, authority, or established belief. Free thinkers include atheists, agnostics and rationalists.”

“No one can be a free thinker who demands conformity to a bible [sic], creed, or messiah. To the freethinker, revelation and faith are invalid, and orthodoxy is no guarantee of truth.”

The New Kosher


Back in our Lord’s day, Israel was under the Law, which included strict dietary laws handed down by the Designer of the human digestive system. Then the Designer Himself came down to correct how folks were interpreting those laws and their importance. He made a point of saying that “it isn’t what goes into a mouth that causes real problems, it is the state of the person’s heart and what that causes folks to spew out of their mouths.” (paraphrase) Matthew shares the event in full in chapter 15:

Then some Pharisees and teachers of the law came to Jesus from Jerusalem and asked, “Why do your disciples break the tradition of the elders? They don’t wash their hands before they eat!”
Jesus replied, “And why do you break the command of God for the sake of your tradition? For God said, ‘Honor your father and mother’ and ‘Anyone who curses their father or mother is to be put to death.’ But you say that if anyone declares that what might have been used to help their father or mother is ‘devoted to God,’ they are not to ‘honor their father or mother’ with it. Thus you nullify the word of God for the sake of your tradition. You hypocrites! Isaiah was right when he prophesied about you:
“‘These people honor me with their lips,
but their hearts are far from me.
They worship me in vain;
their teachings are merely human rules.’”
Jesus called the crowd to him and said, “Listen and understand. What goes into someone’s mouth does not defile them, but what comes out of their mouth, that is what defiles them.”
Then the disciples came to him and asked, “Do you know that the Pharisees were offended when they heard this?”
He replied, “Every plant that my heavenly Father has not planted will be pulled up by the roots. Leave them; they are blind guides. If the blind lead the blind, both will fall into a pit.”
Peter said, “Explain the parable to us.”
“Are you still so dull?” Jesus asked them. “Don’t you see that whatever enters the mouth goes into the stomach and then out of the body? But the things that come out of a person’s mouth come from the heart, and these defile them. For out of the heart come evil thoughts—murder, adultery, sexual immorality, theft, false testimony, slander. These are what defile a person; but eating with unwashed hands does not defile them.”

Fast forward about 1750 years. Some wise men sat around arguing over the laws of a new nation, and decided that giving everyone the right to verbally express their ignorance or intelligence without governmental reprisal was a good thing. Given that the “what you should eat” thing had largely been a settled issue for going on two millennia, they overlooked that part.

Syllogism of Sin


To sin is to put anything above God.

God is the self-existing one.

Therefore, He is Life and the source of life.

Therefore, to sin is to put something else above the source of life.

This puts a barrier between the one who sins and the source of life.

To be cut off from life and the source of life results in death.

Therefore, it makes sense that the wages of sin is death, as the Bible claims.

SDG

8. What is Science?: Conclusions


Everyone has an idea of what is and isn’t science, but not every opinion is equally accurate. We, as scientists, are the ones who must have a clear grasp of these concepts. Careers have been torpedoed by mistakes in this area. How do we expect non-scientists to be able to critically evaluate claims if we ourselves can’t? Once we do, it is then part of our professional obligation to help those with whom we interact to understand also.

Additionally, this ability to analyze things critically applies to more than just laboratory work. Will that health supplement in the infomercial really help me more at $100 per month than having a 50-cent apple every day? Is that politician blowing smoke about a given issue, or might there be truth in it? Who’s selling snake oil and who’s genuinely making a contribution? We educators tend to do a better job of teaching facts than teaching discernment.

Logic and epistemology used to be required parts of our curriculum, but they have faded away to footnotes as a rule. Is this part of some conspiracy? If so, no one has recruited me to join, not that I would. At least part of the explanation is that the sheer quantity of information available to us has exploded beyond anyone’s dreams or nightmares. There is so much to cover in a standard education that many things are just skimmed over, and some have gotten pushed aside. Without laying blame, I simply have tried to give a brief overview of what I feel are critical but commonly overlooked areas of study.

There are so many issues facing our society today that have deep emotional pulls on folks from each side. In order to civilly make real progress in discussing and reaching resolutions, it is important to define terms clearly, determine the kinds of evidence available and the required burden of proof. This sets the parameters. Another key requirement is avoiding ad hominem attacks. Challenges include obstruction by parties that profit from the chaos of unsettled discourse and overcoming peoples’ emotional attachment to their perspective, especially if their success rides on their view winning out.

As Paul admonished in Romans 12:18, “If possible, so far as it depends on you, live peaceably with all.” Maybe understanding the last few posts can help with this.

SDG